2015 Leadership in Enterprise Architecture Driven Results -
Government Project, Civilian

Application Rationalization
General Services Administration

App Rat small

Team Members:

Kevin Wince
Kathryn Palmer
Christopher Brause

Summary of Enterprise Project Challenge:

GSA executives found they were faced with growing complex IT environments and budget constraints. They recognized the need to rationalize GSA’s applications to identify opportunities and modernize its portfolio. GSA executives realized the IT environment was growing to be too expensive to manage and too slow to change.

Summary of EA Driven Solution:

Application rationalization helps guide IT investment decisions. We use a methodology to analyze our application portfolio and assess whether an application should be tolerated, invested, migrated, or eliminated (TIME). The methodology provides a consistent approach to baseline the application inventory and coordinate discussions between business and IT stakeholders.

Who derives the benefit(s) from this EA driven solution?

The primary stakeholders of the application rationalization initiative range from senior level executives, including: GSA’s Chief Information Officer, GSA’s Associate Chief Information Officers, Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner for FAS, to senior managers within the organization, including FAS Business directors and FAS IT directors.

What results and benefits have been achieved to date using the discipline of EA?

Over the last year, after applying application rationalization, the GSA EA program identified more than $8.8 million in cost avoidance in the Federal Acquisition Services’ (FAS) application portfolio. Led by the EA program, we worked in close collaboration with GSA Enterprise IT Governance, business executives, IT managers, as well as the application IT and business owners to help eliminate 30 unnecessary applications.

To date the EA team has evaluated ¾ of the quadrants (Tolerate, Migrate, and Eliminate) which represent over 100 of the applications in the FAS portfolio. See Appendix A for an example of the applications placed in the TIME quadrants. Throughout the process, EA has engaged more than 215 stakeholders. At the conclusion of the team’s analysis of each quadrant, we present our observations and recommendations to the governance boards for their consensus.
With the results of this analysis, GSA can make better-informed IT investment decisions and focus its IT spending on GSA priorities, enabling it to respond to emerging or changing needs with modernized applications and technologies. As a next step, GSA EA will institutionalize application rationalization as part of the agency’s annual IT budget process. GSA EA will continue to conduct application rationalization for all IT portfolios.

Please explain how the EA discipline is being applied and how the appropriate stakeholders and business/mission staff were engaged?

Our application rationalization effort is accomplished in two phases. During phase 1, GSA EA baselined the application inventory. See Appendix B for an excerpt of the FAS application list. After having a comprehensive understanding of the applications utilized by the business, the EA team conducted a user survey to collect their perspectives. The results of the survey were used to inform the initial TIME quadrant analysis, and included the business and technical perspectives of the applications from the users of the agency. The EA team placed each application in one of the TIME quadrants based on their perceived business and technical value, so each application would fall in one of the T, I, M, or E quadrants.
In phase 2, GSA EA focused on one quadrant at a time - T, I, M, or E. Phase 2 involved detailed architecture analysis to better understand the application’s strategic direction. Focused meetings between business and IT owners of the applications were conducted to gather the following critical information on each application:
Business and technical architecture analysis
Cost (O&M, DM&E) analysis
Security analysis

Application rationalization is an example of the value EA can bring to an organization by bridging the gap between IT and business, and enabling business-led strategy that drives how IT supports business in meeting its mission. The information gathered during the meetings informed the GSA EA team’s analysis. The analysis resulted in:
Cost savings or cost avoidance opportunities
Candidates for elimination, migration, or investment
Consolidation of multiple, redundant applications
4-year strategy/roadmap for every application that indicates T, I, M, or E for each year. Example - FY15: T, FY16: T, FY17: M, FY18: E. See Appendix C for an example of the 4-year strategy/roadmap.

Using the assessment results, GSA is making better-informed, data-driven investment decisions and is focusing its IT spending on agency-wide priorities. Our goal is to enable the business to better respond to emerging or changing needs with modernized applications and technologies.
The deliverables for each application rationalization project include:
Phase 1:
Baselined application inventory
Survey questions (Business and technical) to determine usefulness of application
Baseline TIME quadrant with each application plotted to the TIME quadrant
Phase 2:
Application Analysis: business, data, and technical (redundancy, reuse, interfaces, etc.)
Cost analysis of applications (maintenance vs. development)
4-year strategic plan (Appendix C)
Interface diagram (Appendix D)

Why do you consider the results from this EA driven solution worthy of this Award for Excellence?

We believe that application rationalization is worthy of the award for Leadership in Government Transformation using EA because we are on the cutting edge of applying a systematic and innovative approach that is scalable across the enterprise that could be applied to other organizations. We are providing quantitative and qualitative benefits to the business, which enterprise architects often struggle to do. The estimated return on investment (ROI) for the project is 1,595%, a number the business and IT organizations love!



Stay Connected

Zachman Reviews

Quite an enjoyable course.  Would take other courses in future.

Jason D'Silva
8 April 2020

This has been an eye opening experience. Receiving this training from the masters will most certainly keep measurable benefits going forward. John provided additional concepts and practices around implementation strategies, a critical next step in exploiting the framework ontology - this was great!!!

Dennis Johnson
25 April 2018

Hour-for-hour, this is the best seminar I have attended. The instructors thoroughly covered concepts, demonstrated their application effectively and convincingly explained the consequences of poor architectural practice.

Daniel A. Joseph, Ph.D.
20 May 2019

An excellent seminar. John shares his keen intuition for and understanding of the nature of enterprise architecture.

Chris Partridge
29 March 2018

Excellent first hand explanation. Very powerful.

Marco van Leeuwen
29 March 2018

The Zachman framework made me understand the value of problem solving.

Akin Ayeni
29 March 2018

Finally, it all comes together’. Great examples and stories. Continue with passion – it’s really good.

Willem Van der Brink
29 March 2018

Fun, informative and eye-opening. Very educational, friendly and helpful lecturers.

Shiraz Adam
29 March 2018

It was the honor to have met and learned from the legendary John A. Zachman himself, the Father of Enterprise Architecture. True Enterprise Architecture starts with Zachman Framework; otherwise, you are just wasting time.

Amar Masoud
26 April 2017

I have been doing Enterprise architecture since 2003, mostly DoDAF and TOGAF. Until I took the Zachman EA 4 day class, I didn't realize that all I had been doing was drawing incomplete views, since I didn't truly understand the relationships and the real impact to an organization of making a change to an architecture element. This class has shown me the importance of getting down to the "brass tacks" of an EA, namely the Zachman primitives and their relationships. I now realize that I have not been truly been doing EA up to this point, since I have not been identifying the organization's primitives!

Mike Robison
26 April 2017

The Zachman Framework training enabled me to fully understand the power of this framework (the ontology). The fundamentals of this framework will help me to (re)engineer Enterprises and solve business problems in the shortest possible time. As a free-lance Enterprise Architect my customers will benefit the knowledge and Case studies John and Sunil shared with us.

Jef Bergsma
24 March 2011

If you want to synthesize your professional experiences...
If you want to expand your understanding of Enterprise Architecture...
If you want to interact with others who think and talk like you do, and learn from the very best, then the Zachman International courses are for you!

Michelle Poolet
20 October 2008

Enterprise architecture, as a formal discipline, has arguably reached its ‘tipping point.’ Organizations are howling for change. Even in the current economic down-turn, savvy companies are turning to EA and The Zachman Framework for help. Getting Zachman Certified is dollar-for-dollar the smartest investment an architect, any architect, can make. Don’t think about it too long... get certified and join the growing community of Zachman Certified professionals.

Damon Farnham
3 April 2009

An excellent and inspiring seminar - we will return to work and start immediately. I can recommend this seminar with enthusiasm.

David Harrison
2 September 2014

He designed the Framework. Nobody can deliver the same quality of lecture as John.

Kitty Hung
17 October 2013

Engaging and charismatic.

Mark Luxton
6 October 2015

Lots of energy and enthusiasm. Passionate.

Simon Bathie
25 May 2015

Once more I was able to pick-up new ideas and a couple of valuable best practices. Also the EA energy injection by John Zachman was once more a highlight for me.

Henrik Jacobsson
23 April 2016

I was anxious about my decision to take the virtual class but felt like I was in the classroom with you all. Great job!

Burak Modali
23 May 2016

Mr. Zachman is the thought leader in enterprise architecture! I am so honored to have met him at training in Colorado and then again last October at a conference in Washington D.C. Through his publications and training - his efforts to raise the bar for enterprise architecture make him the world renown professional he is today. He IS the father of enterprise architecture. His work has helped to drive strategy execution and subsequent business outcomes through his ontology, strategy mapping, matrixes and models.

Tresa Chastain
8 March 2016

An excellent course. All CEOs and CIOs should attend.

Morag Clark
13 July 2015

An excellent and inspiring seminar - we will return to work and start immediately. I can recommend this seminar with enthusiasm.

David Harrison
18 November 2015

John Zachman presents a very compelling argument, that is, every organization needs an Enterprise Architecture to survive.

Jane Stewart
18 May 2014

Many wide ranging examples to demonstrate why. Engaging and entertaining.

Andre Gauthier
18 August 2016

The explanation of the framework itself and the meaning of the components were most helpful.

Andreja Korosec Rebula
18 June 2014

An excellent seminar. John shares his keen intuition for and understanding of the nature of enterprise architecture.

Chris Partridge
10 August 2015

The enthusiasm, energy and breadth of experience remain, as ever, infectious and mesmerising. Your continued support for John over the last few years is clearly appreciated and probably instrumental in his continuing to return to the UK. Further workshop and/or seminar opportunities are eagerly anticipated. This week has been money very well spent.

Rob Austen
20 June 2016

John Zachman gave me an excellent insight into the way EA practitioners think and operate, enabling me to express an organisation (as business architecture models) in their language.

Matthew Brown
14 June 2016